Invalid and unclear wills
A person who alleges that there is something wrong with a will might even ask a court to treat such a will as if it had never been made.

It is common to hear people talk about ‘challenging the will’ of someone who has died. There are two main reasons for challenging a will. The first reason is that a family member has been left an inadequate inheritance, and that is the subject of our article Making an inheritance (or family provision) claim.

The second reason for challenging a will is on the basis that there is something wrong with the will document itself. A person who alleges that there is something wrong with a will might even ask a court to treat such a will as if it had never been made.

Perhaps the most common argument made by a person asserting that there is something wrong with a will is that the person who made the will (‘the deceased’) did not have sufficient mental capacity when he or she made his will. When making a will, it is necessary for a person to understand the effect of making his or her will, to understand what property he or she has, to appreciate the claims against his or her estate (eg by his or her family members) to which he or she should give effect, and that his or her decision-making should not be affected by delusions.

It is usually much harder to make such an argument about capacity when a lawyer has prepared the deceased’s will – as the lawyer will be expected to say that they believed that the deceased did have sufficient mental capacity at the time. Sometimes lawyers will have arranged for the deceased to be assessed by a medical practitioner or psychologist at around the time that the will was made, to reduce any doubt that the deceased did not have sufficient mental capacity.

A similar argument that could be made is that the deceased was subjected to undue influence by another person when preparing his or her will. This is where the deceased is left feeling that they must make a will (or make a bequest to a particular person) that they do not want to make.

Fraud associated with the making of a will can occur in different ways. A person might have pretended to be a family member of the deceased in order to receive an inheritance under the deceased’s will. A family member might have lied to the deceased about a second family member so that the second family member is left out of the deceased’s will. A false will might have been prepared for the deceased to sign. A related problem is forgery, where a purported will of the deceased found after the deceased’s death may be a forgery that has been created by someone else other than the deceased.

Sometimes it is argued that a will is invalid because it did not meet the formalities required for a will. The courts have become increasingly flexible in allowing informal documents, such as handwritten notes and even video recordings, to be treated as wills.

Another problem with a will can be the deceased’s lack of clarity in the will. A will can be rectified (ie rewritten) by a court if what the deceased wrote in his or her will is unclear or does not match what the deceased was intending.

Missing original wills can also cause problems, particularly where a photocopy of the will is available after the death. On one hand, it might be argued that the original will was simply lost (and the photocopy should be relied upon) but, on the other hand, it might be argued that the deceased did not want that will to stand anymore and so had deliberately destroyed it (which is why the original copy cannot be found).

The various potential problems with wills discussed above – and the difficulties that these can cause to loved ones after death – are good reasons for anyone who is intending to make a will to have that will prepared by a lawyer. Our team of lawyers at O’Loughlins Lawyers has expertise in preparing such wills and associated documents.

It is important that anyone who has concerns about the validity or clarity of a will seeks legal advice as early as possible.

How we can help you

O’Loughlins Lawyers has a team of lawyers who are highly experienced in dealing with deceased estates and conducting estate litigation.

We can assist you by providing you with legal advice about your circumstances and represent you in any court proceedings that may arise.

summary

A copy of this briefing is available for download below:

authors

Julie-Ann Sparkes

Julie-Ann Sparkes | Special Counsel

Julie-Ann joined O’Loughlins in 2014, after moving to Adelaide from the UK.

She specialises in wills and estate planning, advising on and administering deceased estates, working with clients who are domiciled in the UK but resident in Australia and advising clients in the retirement living sector.

Julie-Ann is an affiliate member of the Society of Trust & Estate Practitioners and a member of the Law Society’s Succession and Elder Law Committee, and the Women Lawyers’ Association.  Julie-Ann is also the co-editor of the Law Society of South Australia's publication 'The Last Testament'.

Julie-Ann is a Notary Public, performing a wide range of notarial services and is a Fellow of The Australian and New Zealand College of Notaries.

Jacquie Rochow

Jacquie Rochow | Associate

Jacquie joined O’Loughlins in April 2024, having gained experience working with small and large legal firms, barristers, state government, and national and international NGOs.  She holds a Bachelor of Laws (Honours) and a Bachelor of Arts (Major in Philosophy) from the University of Adelaide, and a Graduate Diploma in Global Competition and Consumer Law from the University of Melbourne.  Jacquie was admitted to practice in July 2020.

Jacquie assists in the areas of health and aged care, retirement living, and commercial and estate litigation, and is a member of the Law Society of South Australia's Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Committee and also its Animal Law Committee.

Disclaimer

This newsletter is merely an overview and accordingly it is not to be relied on as legal or other advice or on any other basis whatsoever. All legal liability arising from use of information contained in this newsletter is disclaimed to the maximum extent permitted by law. Readers should obtain independent legal and other professional advice suitable to their individual circumstances.